In Every Trade, the Best Eventually Go Out on Their Own
Last year, my primary care physician left the insurance system. She didn't retire and she didn't move away. She simply opened a small, direct-pay practice.
A few months later, my OB-GYN did the same thing.
At first I assumed it was a coincidence. Now I think I was watching something much bigger happen in slow motion.
Neither doctor started offering a revolutionary treatment. Neither invented a new procedure. What they did was put a price on something that used to feel included: time, continuity, someone who actually knows you.
That's the part that keeps sticking with me. Most of us assumed that having a doctor meant having someone who remembered our story — our medications, our family, the conversation from last year. It turns out that was never quite what the system was built to provide.
And I don't think this is only a healthcare story. It's a story about incentives.
Every system eventually becomes very good at optimizing the things it can measure. Patients per hour, billing codes, wait times, productivity. Relationships aren't on that list. Not because they don't matter, but because they're hard to measure, and systems quietly stop paying for what they can't count.
For years, great physicians filled that gap themselves. They stayed late. They remembered your kids' names. They squeezed one more question into a fifteen-minute appointment. The relationship didn't disappear. The doctors subsidized it.
That's the subsidy that's ending.
When a physician opens a direct-pay practice, I don't think she's running away from medicine. I think she's running toward it, choosing to charge for the very thing the system slowly stopped valuing.
Once you notice that pattern, you see it everywhere. The teacher who leaves the classroom to tutor. The accountant who leaves the national firm. The hairstylist who rents her own chair. The trainer who opens a private studio. Every one of them is making the same bet: the institution can deliver the service, but only a person can deliver the relationship.
We call this the rise of subscriptions. I'm not sure that's the right name. A subscription is simply what a relationship looks like once you decide it's worth paying to preserve. You don't subscribe to a transaction. You subscribe to someone who knows you.
Which brings me to AI.
Most people worry that AI will replace human expertise. I suspect it will do something more interesting: it will make expertise cheaper. The transactional parts of many professions are about to get faster, easier, and increasingly automated, and that only raises the value of what can't be automated. Attention. Judgment. Context. Trust. Knowing someone.
The diagnosis may get faster. Knowing the patient won't.
For most of modern history, we treated relationships as the soft part of work, the nice addition wrapped around the real value. I think that's inverting. Efficiency is becoming the commodity. The relationship is becoming the premium product.
Maybe that's what my doctors saw before the rest of us did. They didn't leave medicine. They left the part of medicine that had forgotten what people were actually looking for.
And I wonder if, ten years from now, we'll realize they weren't ahead of healthcare. They were ahead of everything.